Asher Labs · Auto Trading · concept

You have 2,283 markets. Which ones does the bot trade?

Every pair already carries a fitted, liquidation-safe strategy. The Auto Trading page's real job isn't to show data — it's to let you arm the handful you trust and leave the rest off. Four ways to do that, below — each live and clickable.

Universe2,283perps
Canonical968assets
0-liq fits11,016configs
Your basket0armed

A

Trade Deck

Best for a curated shortlist you actually watch

A card per asset: price, a 7-day spark, the fitted strategy (direction-locked), and the four numbers that decide it — net, win, max drawdown, DCA reliance — with one big ARM switch. Scannable and visual; armed cards light up. Great up to ~30 pairs, weak for scanning thousands.

0 armed · est. margin $0
B

Screener Pro

Best for power users ranking the whole universe

Your existing screener, extended with the fit columns and a per-row ARM toggle. Click any header to sort — rank by expected net, funding, or lowest drawdown, multi-select, then arm in bulk. Scales to 2,000 rows; the tradeoff is it reads as numbers, not pictures.

Coin Price 24h Best fit Exp net Max DD DCA Trades TF Liq Arm
Armed
0
Combined margin
$0
Blended exp. net
Worst-case DD
C

Focus

Best for vetting each pair before you commit

A slim list on the left, a full read-out on the right: the fit's chart with its hedge risk-zones, the stats that matter, the live cross-venue price and liquidation math, and the arm controls in one place. You look before you leap — slower to bulk-arm, safest for real money.

D

Basket by conviction

Best for building a portfolio, not picking singles

Group every asset by how clean its fit is — Apex-grade (0 liq, green, DCA ≤ 7%), Solid, Speculative, and Excluded (bad funding / no safe fit, shown greyed so you know we looked). Toggle names into the basket and watch the portfolio — blended return, total margin, worst-case drawdown — update on the right.

My take

Ship B as the workhorse, C as the drill-in, and let A be the default landing view.

A (Trade Deck) is the friendliest first impression and the right default for the ~10–30 pairs most users will ever run. B (Screener Pro) is the only one that honestly scales to 2,283 and lets a serious user rank by expected net or lowest drawdown and arm in bulk — it should be the same table as Markets, just with the fit columns + arm switch bolted on. C (Focus) is where someone confirms a single pair before risking money, so it doubles as the "are you sure?" step. D (Basket) is the most opinionated and the most on-brand — it turns selection into portfolio construction and keeps drawdown in the user's face, which is exactly the honesty gap we just hit on the tester.

Every layout shows Max DD next to net on purpose: arming a bot should never look like free money.